Introduction
E-learning to me is an amazing word that explains an array of tools and uses. Through this course I have been exposed to a life time supply of usable ICT’s which with the right scaffolding can help my teaching and students understanding in the future. This tool incorporates digital learning which can contain digital technologies and internet based sources. E learning can be as simple as typing up a document in Word or be as complex as creating your own website through Weebly. Whatever the mode type it can be classified under E learning. Derek Stockley (2003) defines E learning as “The delivery of a learning, training or education program by electronic means. E-learning involves the use of a computer or electronic device (e.g. a mobile phone) in some way to provide training, educational or learning material”. This type of learning is essential for every classroom of today. Prensky (2001) also suggests that “Our students today are all “native speakers” of the digital language of computers, video games and the Internet”. We know that the technologies will help with the students learning because Prensky shows us that the students know how to use them and understand how they work. Students who use ICT as a tool are able to efficiently and effectively access digital information to help assist with investigating issues, solving problems and decision making. Students are exposed to communicating, sharing and collaboratively working in the global environments (Education Queensland, 2012). The following reflective synopsis contains information about the four tools which I have decided to analyse. It will also examine the Legal and Ethical issues related to these tools.
Wiki Activities
The Wiki Activities completed in the first couple weeks were designed to enable group collaboration. But what it really showcased was a whole heap of repeated work. I do believe that the activity was designed so everyone could have their opinions heard but there was a majority of repetition as more people added to the discussion. With all this said I think that the De Bono’s Hats activity was an appropriate choice but lacked the subjective difference within the hats. Overall it was a great way to engage a large audience and perceived the needs of a collaborative exercise. There was a great deal of critical responses which changed my mind over the issue and would definitely use the wiki based task in future planning. Click here for a PMI created by us the students which shows great analysis about wikis.
Tool 1: Microsoft Power point
I previously have never used Microsoft PowerPoint for anything other than aiding an oral presentation. Uploading pictures to the PowerPoint to create the picture slides for the assessment was what I thought the limitations of PowerPoint were. Until undertaking some experimentation this was the uses I had for it. My new view of PowerPoint is much broader now, I can see that PowerPoint has many useful and effective features which can be used in classroom teaching. PowerPoint allows you to view images, videos and sounds on the slides. With some scaffolding all these features could be incorporated into a PowerPoint that can be used for learning in the classroom. They can engage, inform and challenge the students which can allow for student paced involvement. You can crop, copy, create duplicate slides, edit backgrounds, edit grouping and add speak text to just name a few tools. But to ensure these are properly used in the classroom the students will need to be shown or instructed how to use the tools. I myself only really discovered these tools this year so with some guidance the students could incorporate the various aspects of PowerPoint into every assessment. Once thought very limited this program posses movie making features which would be a very useful when challenging students to create their own movies that don’t include a video camera. The only legal issues with this program would be referencing and plagiarism if uploaded onto the web. As usual permission would be required by students to place anything onto the web.
I did create a very simple PowerPoint to then make a video in movie maker but due to not having the program this was unsuccessful. Click here to access my wiki spaces page where I have up loaded the PowerPoint but if that does not work click here to view the same PowerPoint on our group wiki. Note to find the PowerPoint on the group wiki scroll down in the first hat to the bottom where my writing is in orange and the PowerPoint is embedded there.
Tool 2: Pod Casting
Pod casting was a new tool which I was introduced to this year which I can see could be used very creatively. Unlike some other programs I used podomatic seemed to have limitless uploading capabilities. In other words you could use just about any type of program/camera to then upload the pod cast. Podcastings are great for engaging student’s interests because they do posses the video technology. Videos can be seen as more exciting and more capable of creativity by the students. Click here for a PMI about podcasting posted onto youtube. Podcasting would be a great tool for those learners who are not terribly strong at public/oral speeches. This tool would allow the students to be completely comfortable in their own home as well as have as many retakes as they need possible. Once on the web though it doesn’t end there, you can subscribe and follow favourite pages. You could use this tool for a task where the students have to document a digital diary of a weekly analysis to then be used in a very similar situation like this assessment. The students could watch each other’s video entries to gain more knowledge about the topic and with the final assessment create a summative reflection of the unit. There are a few legal issues involved with this tool as they are encountering the web. Students would still need to take into consideration what is appropriate and ethical language. Rude or obscene gestures would definitely not be accepted along with other sensible casting material. Overall they are a great source for informing the viewers and can be exactly how you want them to be.
Tool 3: Weebly
I have previously used this website for a maths assignment at Uni and I feel is a great resource for many students to gain skills in creating a website. Click here for a quick PMI on the weebly website. This website is great as there are a number of user options which enables the students to understand how to create a web page particularly with this are exposed to many legal issues. The website post many valuable features which help the students along their way. The following link is of a brainstorming PMI completed by us about websites which outlines some great Positives and negatives which incorporate the weebly website. Group PMI
The legal issues for these types of tools are very niggly due to copy write and plagiarism. These would be the biggest legal issues along with student permission and site accessibility. Firstly referencing everything will be required to attain who has the rights to the information. Just like if our uni assignments referencing lists would be required on the website. Again when incorporating work from students their permission is needed when uploading work. The most crucial factor within these tools is the fact that you might want a password security to access the site. Student privacy is the main focus here and viewing wrights should be discussed but with this tool there are no capabilities for secure websites. The following link takes you to the weebly website which I created for my previous assignemnt. Its overall outline is the key to this tool as it allows you to plan whole units for the students to work through at their own pace.
Tool 4: Bubbl.us
This tool really takes the standard cloud concept maps which we still create on our black boards to the next level. This tool might actually be the easiest concept mapping website every made. Once on the website it is an easy step to sign up which is free. A straight up bonus but the positives don’t stop there, once into the creating screen it is as simple as writing a txt into the bubble and clicking Ctrl ENTER to make a linking bubble off it. The simple ease required to apprehend this tool is unbelievable. The reason I have chosen it as one of my tools is for this reason. It works and can make a boring task into something interacting and fun. My week 5 reflection shows an example of which a student could create a concept map on and talks about its uses. With these simple tools capturing my attention due to my annoyance of not understanding something and not really seeing the point trying to figure it out over half a day. The creations from this tool can be saved on the username desktop and be printed. A big bonus this has is its HTML code capabilities which allow it to be uploaded on various web based programs like Blogger. There is a PMI for this device below which was constructed on the program as well. Both of my past Uni pracs have had interactive whiteboards in the classroom and a similar program was used for this purpose. The simple nature of leaving the website on the desk top allowed for easy use and availability. The tool could definitely be used for group and individual task that allow for presentation settings. I feel that the tool might have been constructed for student use just because of how simple the format is. The following link shows a great PMI about the Bubbl.us tool. The main disadvantage to this tool would be that you cannot put restrictions onto your concept map allowing your students to add their ideas. Although you could possibly link the page to your class blog so they can access it still. The legal worries that relate to this tool would be very little. Again if there were any referenced ideas then the usual concepts would be applied. Also the content that is uploaded would have to be appropriate and student accounts would definitely have to be monitored. To become a member you need to include a current mail address only in cases of lost passwords so students would have to acquire one of these. But at no time is the email account used for anything other.
Conclusion
Through my journey in this course I have rediscovered what it takes to teach in this modern world. Instead of trying to restructure the students we as teachers must familiarise ourselves with the modern technology. Students are very familiar with these modern technologies and so it is up to us to further challenge our students by knowing the current ICTs. It is our challenge as educators to integrate ICT into subject teaching and learning using pedagogical approaches (Hennessy, Harrison and Wamakote, 2010). E-learning has exposed me to different ICT tools and there uses in modern classrooms. I would definitely use PowerPoint, Weebly, Podcast and Bubbl in the future to help with my students understanding. The endless possibilities of ICTs through e-learning has excited me for the future.
Reference
Department of Education. (2012). ICT in learning. Retrieved from http://www.det.wa.edu.au/education/cmis/eval/curriculum/ict/
Hennessy, S., Harrison, D., & Wamakote, L. (2010). Teacher Factors Influencing Classroom Use of ICT in Sub-Saharan Africa. Retrieved from www.cambridgetoafrica.org/.../Hennessy%20etal_FINAL.pdf